Heine's Ramblings and Rumblings


Leave a comment

The best explanation I have seen regarding solar panel regulators , ex the 4×4 community forum

Hi Guys
A lot has been written about solar panels and chargers but it appears that there is still a lot of confusion. I would like to clarify this by giving an overview on solar panels followed by the different charge regulators. *SOLAR PANELS*
Solar panels are made up of P-N junctions stringed in series and parallel. A single P-N junction produces about 0.7V at 25 deg C. Thus a panel with 36 cells/junctions will produce an open circuit (not loaded) voltage of about 25.2V at 25 deg C. This voltage is highly temperature dependant and becomes less at elevated temperatures.
Secondly and most often misunderstood is the fact that solar panels behave as current sources and not voltage sources. This means that the output current is automatically limited by the panel wattage. There is therefore NO NEED FOR A CURRENT LIMITER in the controller as long as the correct controller is chosen for the solar panel output. (A battery is is voltage source of which the maximum current is limited by its internal resistance resulting in hundreds of amps when shorted.
Thirdly the maximum output power of a 36-cell solar panel occurs at about 16-17V. When not loaded the output power is zero (Vo*Io) where Vo is more than 20V and Io is zero. When shorted out Vo is zero and Io is equal to the specified short circuit current. The output power is again zero in this case. It is thus clear that the maximum output power occurs somewhere in between she shorted and open circuit point which happen to be around 16-17V. This operating point is temperature dependant and generally applies for a panel surface temperature of about 50 deg C. *SOLAR CHARGE CONTROLLERS*
There are four types of charge controllers on the market.
*Bang-bang type (selling for R100 to about R350)*
These controllers use either a relay or transistor and connect the panel directly to the battery while the battery voltage is below the fully charged voltage. When a voltage sensing circuit sees that the full voltage is reached (14.2V depends on manufacturer) the solar panel is disconnected until the voltage drops below the full voltage. This process repeats itself over and over. THESE REGULATORS CANNOT BE USED TO POWER LOADS (lights, etc.) WITHOUT A BATTERY BECAUSE THE PANEL IS PERIODICALLY CONNECTED AND DISCONNECTED FROM THE LOAD *PWM (Pulse Width Modulated) Step down (Buck) converters*
These can be used to power a load without a battery. The conversion efficiency is in the order of 95% which means that 95% of what is put into the controller will be available on the output) There are three versions of PWM controllers.
* *Basic PWM controller – (selling for about R300 to R1,000) *These controllers pull the solar panel voltage down to about one volt above the battery voltage (to complicated to explain here) which means that the panel voltage is in the range of about 13V to 15V which is slightly below the typical maximum output power point of most solar panels. This means that you will be losing about 15% of the output power of your solar panel because you are not operating at the maximum power point. This loss should be weighed up against the cost of a bigger panel of power point tracking controller.
* *Power Point Tracking PWM controller – (Selling for R1,000 plus) *There are mainly two types namely MPPC and MPPT controllers.
* *MPPC (Maximum Power Point Control)* These units contain circuits that pre-sets the operating point of the solar panel at about 16.7V which is correct for a 36-cell panel with a surface temperature of 50 deg C. The lost 15% of solar panel could be harvested under these operating conditions as long as the panel surface temperature is around 50 deg C. This implies that the maximum power cannot be extracted from a solar panel in very cold or extreme heat conditions but it should be weighed up against the cost of a MPPT controller. The selling price of these units should only be slightly more than the price of a basic PWM controller.
* *MPPT (Maximum Power Point Tracking)* These controllers are complicated and contain circuitry that constantly calculates the maximum power point by measuring both panel voltage and current and then shifting the operating point to track the maximum power point. *BUT BEWARE -* *the cheap versions are often operating above or below the maximum power point with little time spend at the maximum power point. *Claims made that these controllers can extract 30% or more power from a panel should be questioned. Expect a power extraction gains of about 15%.

I hope this helps to clarify some panel and controller issues because we live in a world of buzz-words and sales gimmicks intended to sell products to customers that are often not in a position to verify the claims. Members that require more technical detail can contact me directly. Best regards
Manie du Preez
***************

Advertisements


Leave a comment

MEDIA RELEASE: SANRAL’S PLANS TO PROSECUTE eTOLL TRANSGRESSORS SEVERELY FLAWED

I though this was worth sharing

 

From: coms [mailto:coms@jp-sa.org] On Behalf Of Howard Dembovsky

Sent: 09 September 2013 02:15 PM
To: coms List Member
Subject: FW: MEDIA RELEASE: SANRAL’S PLANS TO PROSECUTE eTOLL TRANSGRESSORS SEVERELY FLAWED

Dear mailing list subscriber.

Please find below, a media release we have just sent out.

JPSA MEDIA STATEMENT – FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

TO: ALL NEWS, CRIME AND TRANSPORT EDITORS
DATE: MONDAY 9 SEPTEMBER 2013
SUBJECT: SANRAL’S PLANS TO PROSECUTE eTOLL TRANSGRESSORS SEVERELY FLAWED

JOHANNESBURG – The article which appeared in the Times Newspaper today wherein Vusi Mona has explained how SANRAL plans to “punish eToll rebels” has reference.

It is very interesting to note the revelations contained in this report and to see that SANRAL has again chosen to resort to levelling threats of criminal prosecution in an attempt to intimidate motorists into complying with their prepaid model of eToll collection.

Previously, SANRAL claimed that 600 000 eTags had been sold, but now it is claiming that 100 000 less than their previous claims have in fact been sold. This must raise the question as to just how accurate any of their claims, including but not limited to the monthly financial prejudice citizens will incur actually are. Additionally, this is the first time that they have come clean with the proportions of whom these eTags have been sold to, with an alleged 300 000 of them having been sold to private individuals – which we assume means individuals and companies which are not State institutions.

According to eNaTIS, there are 3 799 750 registered in Gauteng as at 30 June 2013. SANRAL claims that around 2 500 000 of these use Gauteng’s eToll freeways on a daily/monthly basis, and therefore it is safe to assume that more than 2 million vehicles do not have eTags at this stage. This represents 80% of the vehicles on the road in Johannesburg and Tshwane not having eTags.

It has been stated by Vusi Mona and others that the Criminal Procedure Act will be used to prosecute eToll “rebels” and this is entirely possible – even with AARTO in effect in Johannesburg and Tshwane, by simply classifying all eToll violations as criminal offences. What seems to have been overlooked however is the fact that the National Prosecuting Authority does not prosecute one million criminal matters in total over the course of a year; let alone double that each month.

If it is SANRAL’s intention to bring a grinding halt to the South African criminal justice system, they are most certainly going the right way about achieving this. Clearly they would like all prosecutions for serious crimes to be side-lined in favour of criminalising people who choose to oppose their unjust eToll laws.

It is very easy to say how they will deal with eToll “rebels” in an attempt to scare them, but it is not so easy to carry out these threats. SANRAL engaging in such behaviour is despicable and such actions are additionally completely contrary to the “Batho Pele” principle which is supposed to be rooted and promoted in any political and legislative framework.

ßENDSà

Best Regards,

Howard Dembovsky

National Chairman – Justice Project South Africa (NPC)

Association Not For Gain | Incorporated as a non-profit company under the Companies Act, 2008 | Registration Number 2010/019972/08
Tel: +27 (0) 12 753 6802 or +27 (0) 81 302 3694

Mobile: +27 (0) 82 418 6210

Fax: +27 (0) 86 647 3293

Website: www.jp-sa.org
Follow JPSA on Twitter
“Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere” – Martin Luther King
“All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men and women do nothing ” – Edmund Burke
JPSA Head Office: Ground Floor, 500 Kyalami Boulevard, Kyalami Office Park, Kyalami, Midrand, 1684 –

 

Email Disclaimer: http://www.jp-sa.org/EmailDisclaimer.asp